Please Note: Our firm is still open for business and accepting new clients. To protect your safety in response to the threats of COVID-19, we are offering new and current clients the ability to meet with us via telephone or through video conferencing. Please call our office to discuss your options.
Jaspers Moriarty Wetherille

Seasoned Legal Judgment For The South Metro Area

Minnesota’s “New” Cohabitation Law

On Behalf of | Aug 23, 2016 | Family Law |

Minnesota’s spousal maintenance statute has just changed adding a potential new set of elements to allow a former spouse to modify a previously ordered spousal maintenance (alimony) award. The idea for the new language and changes derives from a 1979 Minnesota Supreme Court decision, and addresses a common issue arises in spousal maintenance calculation: Many recipients of spousal maintenance cohabitate with significant others and avoid marriage, effectively keeping their household income at a lower rate in order to receive a higher amount in maintenance from an ex-spouse after dissolution. For over 37 years, Minnesota case law has adopted the idea that “a meretricious relationship between a divorced spouse and another may be grounds for reducing or terminating alimony ‘in so far as it might improve an ex-spouse’s economic well-being.’” Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561, 564 (Minn. 1979). What does that mean? Basically if you are living together like a married couple, with the exception of actually being married, that could be grounds to modify the spousal support award.

As of August 1, 2016, a new subdivision has been added to Minnesota’s spousal maintenance statute solidifying this idea as statutory. Minn. Stat. § 518.552 Subd. 6 permits the obligor of spousal maintenance to pursue a modification of the monthly amount “based on the cohabitation by the maintenance obligee with another adult following the dissolution of the marriage.” Minn. Stat. § 518.522 Subd. 6. The modification may include:

    1. A Reduction;
    2. A Suspension;
    3. A Reservation; or
    4. Termination

Minn. Stat. 518.552 Subd. 6 (a). In determining whether a modification of spousal maintenance is necessary based on cohabitation of the obligee, the court will consider:

  1. “whether the obligee would marry the cohabitant but for the maintenance award;
  2. the economic benefit the oblige derives from the cohabitation;
  3. the length of the cohabitation and the likely future duration of the cohabitation; and
  4. the economic impact on the obligee if maintenance is modified and the cohabitation ends.”

Minn. Stat. 518.552 Subd. 6 (a)(1)-(4). However, there are some pitfalls to applying these factors:

  • “The court must not modify a maintenance award based solely on cohabitation if a marriage between the obligee and the cohabitant would be prohibited,” which in other words, means that the cohabitant is a family member. Minn. Stat. 518.552 Subd. 6 (b);
  • “A modification under this subdivision must be precluded or limited to the extent the parties have entered into a private agreement,” which is usually described as when the parties agree to a Karon waiver under Minn. Stat. 518.552 Subd. 5; and lastly
  • A motion to modify a spousal maintenance award on the basis of cohabitation may not:
    • be brought within one year of the date of entry of the decree of dissolution or legal separation that orders spousal maintenance; unless
    • the parties have agreed in writing that a motion may be brought; or
    • the court finds a failing to allow the motion to proceed would create an extreme hardship for one of the parties.

Minn. Stat. 518.552 Subd. 6 (b)-(c). Notwithstanding these limitations, if you or someone you know that may have a spousal maintenance award that is eligible for modification under Minnesota’s not-so new cohabitation law, please give us a call at 952-445-2817, and one of our experienced attorney’s will be able to assist you.